|
課程名稱 |
考古學基礎理論
Fundamental Theories of Archaeology |
|
開課學期 |
110-2 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 人類學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
陳瑪玲 |
|
課號 |
Anth7002 |
|
課程識別碼 |
125 M2640 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二3,4,5(10:20~13:10) |
|
上課地點 |
水源人201 |
|
備註 |
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。本課程為研究所必修。中文授課，使用英文書籍。
總人數上限：20人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1102Anth7002_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
所有的考古學研究與知識的建構都奠基在某一理論架構上而展開，這一理論架構影響著考古學者如何思考何謂考古學、考古學的材料(物質遺留與物質文化)、如何進行研究、如何詮釋考古資料、甚而如何衡量其他考古研究。也因為這些理論架構，讓考古學可以不斷反省本身的可能及侷限，使得這個學科不斷前進並與當代社會持續對話。本課將透過對歷時考古學理論的討論，熟悉考古學發展迄今的各項理論論述。 |
|
課程目標 |
主要以討論考古學理論的發展歷史背景、理論概念與方法論、相關學者與其學術論述、以及研究主題等面向，以期由理論、方法論、學者的學術發展與論述、主題的角度瞭解什麼是考古學、其性質和目的，如何重建人類的生活方式、及其知識是如何產出的。 |
|
課程要求 |
此為一碩士班進階討論課，故以同學們透過文獻的閱讀進行討論為主要課程進行方式，每堂課需要有一名帶討論的負責人，每位同學必須閱讀完所有文獻，並完成讀書摘要，在每次課堂上，負責同學準備不同的問題，帶動課堂討論。期末每位同學需完成一份期末報告，期末報告的書寫需符合學術寫作的要求。隨堂口頭報告與課堂參與（20%）、期中作業及指定教材和參考資料的閱讀（80%; 4/4）。
作業：文化－歷史、過程、後過程(&PPP)、考古學vs文化人類學議題分析
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
Trigger, Bruce G.
2006 History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, Ian:
1986 Reading the Past. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, David Hurst (Third edition)
1998 Archaeology. Harcourt Brace & Company, Florida.
|
|
參考書目 |
參考書目 Reference:
Sharer, Robert J. & Wendy Ashmore
1979 Fundamentals of Archaeology. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.
Willey, Gordon R. & Jeremy A. Sabloff
1974 A History of American Archaeology. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Readings:
考古學的本質與理論、方法學概念:Week 2
Chapter 1&10 in Trigger
Binford, Lewis R.
1981 Middle Range Research and the Role of Actualistic Studies. in Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths, pp 21-30. Academic, New York.
古典與古器物學時期Classic and Antiquarianism :
Chapter 2&3 in Trigger
科學技術發展時期Scientific Development:
Chapter 4&5 in Trigger
文化--歷史取向時期Cultural-Historical Approach:
Chapter 6 in Trigger
功能研究取向時期Functionsim Approach:
Chapter 7 in Trigger
過程學派Processual Archaeology:
Chapter 8 in Trigger
Binford, L.R.
1989 The "New Archaeology," Then and Now. In Archaeological Thought in
American, ed. by C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky.pp50-6. Cambridge University Press.
後過程學派Post Processual Archaeology:
Chapter 8 in Trigger
Chapter 7 in Hodder
演化論考古學Evolutionism Approach：
Chapter 9 in Trigger
Pragmatic Archaeology and Archaeological Semiotics
Fowles, S.
2016 The Perfect Subject (Postcolonial Objects Studies). Journal of Material Culture 21 (1):9-27.
Hodder, Ian & Gavin Lucas
2017 The Symmetries and Asymmetries of Human-thing Relations A Dialogue. Archaeological Dialogues 24(2):119-137.
Preucel, Robert W.
2016 Pragmatic Archaeology and Semiotic Mediation, Semiotic Review:4
Preucel, Robert W. and Alexander A. Bauer
2001 Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34(2)：85-96
Archaeology and Ontology
Alberti, Benjamin, and Tamara L. Bray
2009 Animating Archaeology: Of Subjects, Objects, and Alternative Ontologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(3): 337-343.
Hill, E
2011 Animals as Agents: Hunting Ritual and Relational Ontologies in Prehistoric Alaska and Chukotka. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(3): 407-426.
Wilkinson, D.
2013 The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology, and the Inka Sovereign. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23(3): 417-432.
Archaeology and Assemblage
Fowler, Chris
2017 Relational Typologies, Assemblage Theory and Early Bronze Age Burials. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27(1): 95-109
Hamilakis, Yannis, and Andrew Jones
2017 Archaeology and Assemblage. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27: 77-84
Robinson, David.
2017 Assemblage Theory and the Capacity to Value: An Archaeological Approach from Cache Cave, California, USA. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27(1): 155-68.
生業--經濟Subsistence-Economics:
Ferran Borrel and Miquel Molist
2014 Social Interaction at the End of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B:an Inter-site
Analysis in the Euphrates Valley. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24: 215-232.
Rautman, Alison E.
1993 Resource Variability, Risk, and the Structure of Social Networks: An
Example from the Prehistoric Southwest. American Antiquity 58(3): 403-424.
Minnis, Paul E., Michael E. Whalen and R. Emerson Howell
2006 Fields of Power:Upland Farming in the Prehispanic Casas Grandes Polity, Chihuahua, Mexico. American Antiquity 71(4 ): 707-722
社會政治組織Social, Political Structure:
Bardolph, Dana
2014 Evaluating Cahokian Contact and Mississippian Identity Politics in the Late Prehistoric Central Illinois River Valley American Antiquity 79(1):69-89.
Trubitt, Mary Beth
2000 Mound Building and Prestige Goods Exchange: Changing Strategies in the
Cahokia Chiefdom. American Antiquity 65(4):669-690
Stone, Tammy
2000 Prehistoric Community Integration in the Point of Pines Region of Arizona. Journal of Field Archaeology 27(2): 197-208.
物質、認同、邊界Material, Identity, Boundary:
Eerkens, Jelmer W.
2000 Practice Makes within 5% of Perfect: Visual Perception, Motor Skills, and Memory in Artifact Variation. Current Anthropology 41(4):663-668.
Franklin, Maria
2001 Archaeological Dimension of Soul Food: Interpreting Race, Culture,
and Afro-Virginian Identity. In Race and the Archaeology of Identity, by
Charles E. Orser Jr. pp. 88-107. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake
City.
Goodby, Robert G.
1998 Technological Patterning and Social Boundaries: Ceramic Variability in Southern New England, A.D. 1000-1675. In the Archaeology of Social Boundaries ed. by Miriam T. Stark, pp161-82. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
Ortman, Scott G.
2000 Conceptual Metaphor in the Archaeological Record: Methods and an
Example from the American Southwest. American Antiquity 65(4):613-645
Crown, Patricia L.
2007 Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 72(4): 677-690.
Quinian, Angus R.
2003 Marks of Distribution: Rock Art and Ethnic Identification in the Great
Basin. American Antiquity 68(2): 372-390
器物、地景、記憶、認知Artifacts, Landscape, Cognition:
Hodder, Ian and Craig Cessford
2004 Daily Practice and Social Memory at Catalhoyuk. American Antiquity 69(1): 17-40.
Cerezo-Román, Jessica I.
2015 Unpacking Personhood and Funerary Customs in the Hohokam Area of Southern Arizona. American Antiquity 80(2):353-375(23)
Llobera, Marcos
1996 Exploring the Topography of Mind: GIS, Social Space and Archaeology. Antiquity 70(269):612-622.
Renfrew, Colin
2001 Production and Consumption in a Sacred Economy: The Material Correlates of High Devotional Expression at Chaco Canyon. American Antiquity 66(1):14-25(經濟體系在認知考古學下之分析)
Plog, Stephen
2003 Exploring the Ubiquitous through the Unusual: Color Symbolism in Pueblo Black-on white Pottery. American Antiquity 68(4):665-695.
Van Dyke, Ruth M.
2004 Memory, Meaning, and Masonry: the Late Bonito Chacoan Landscape. American Antiquity 69(3): 413-431.
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|